A Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial, Comparing the Combination of Caffeine, Carisoprodol, Sodium Diclofenac and Paracetamol versus Cyclobenzaprine, to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety in the Treatment of Patients with Acute Low Back Pain and Lumboischialgia

نویسندگان

  • REYNALDO JESUS GARCIA FILHO
  • MARCOS KORUKIAN
  • DAN CARAI MAIA VIOLA
  • BARROS PUERTAS
چکیده

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of diclofenac, paracetamol, carisoprodol, and caffeine in the treatment of acute low back pain and lumboischialgia, compared to the efficacy and safety of cyclobenzaprine. Study design: Single-center, comparative, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Method: Drugs were administered t.i.d. for a period of 7 days. Study population: 108 patients with a diagnosis of acute low back pain and lumboischialgia in the last 7 days were randomized, being included 54 patients in each group. Endpoints: The primary efficacy endpoints selected for the study were the pain visual analog scale and the Roland-Morris questionnaire, the results of which were compared before and after treatment. The secondary endpoints were the patient’s and the investigator’s overall assessment of the treatment, as well as the use of the analgesic rescue medication. The safety criteria were the tolerability analysis, the medication discontinuation due to adverse events, and laboratory tests. Results: There were no statistically significant differences among the groups regarding efficacy in any of the endpoints examined. Both medications have been shown to be safe and tolerable in the treatment of acute low back pain and lumboischialgia. The thorough statistical analysis revealed a difference between the two groups only concerning adverse events, which were more frequent in the group treated with cyclobenzaprine.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Effect of acupuncture on the pain of patients with acute low back pain: A randomized double-blind clinical trial study

Introduction: Low back pain is one of the most common causes of daily activity limitation and functional disabilities that affect a large number of people in the community. Due to the ineffectiveness of oral analgesics in relieving this type of pain and the need for their long-term use, which has its own side effects, the present study investigated the supplementary effect of acupuncture on pai...

متن کامل

Comparison between Intravenous Sodium Valproate and Subcutaneous Sumatriptan for Treatment of Acute Migraine Attacks; Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: Sodium valproate (SV) has been approved for migraine prophylaxis and its intravenous form is used to treat acute migraine attacks. We compared the efficacy and safety of intravenous SV and subcutaneous Sumatriptan in managing acute migraine attacks. Methods: This double-blind randomized clinical trial divided 90 patients into two groups: one group received 400 mg of intravenous SV a...

متن کامل

Evaluation of the efficacy of topical Caffeine in the treatment of Psoriasis Vulgaris: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial

Background and aim: Psoriasis is one of the most common papulosquamous diseases that often requires long-term maintenance therapy. Long-term use of topical corticosteroids on the face and intertriginous areas will increase the risk of steroids side effects such as striae and atrophy development. A safe, effective and inexpensive modality in topical therapy of inverse psoriasis is required...

متن کامل

Clinical Efficacy of Celecoxib with and without Caffeine versus Ibuprofen for Pain Control following Crown Lengthening Surgery

  Objective: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most commonly prescribed pain control medications following periodontal surgery. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of three drug regimens namely celecoxib, celecoxib + caffeine and ibuprofen for pain relief following crown lengthening surgery.   Methods: This randomized, double blind clinical trial was performed on 45 pa...

متن کامل

Minoxidil in combination with Tretinoin vs. Minoxidil in the treatment of male androgenic alopecia: A randomized, double-blind, parallel clinical trial

Background: Minoxidil is currently an approved treatment for androgenetic alopecia. Topical tretinoin can enhance skin absorption of minoxidil. Objective: This study has been done in order to determine the efficacy and safety of the solution of 0.5% minoxidil+0.05% tretinoin compared to 2% minoxidil in androgenetic alopecia in men. Patients and Methods: In a randomized, double-blind, parallel-g...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2006